Skip to content
EvCompass

Family comparison

Suzuki e VITARA vs Volkswagen ID.3 Neo

Compare verified version prices, use-case scores, winter routes and energy costs in Poland.

Use-case scores

Which version scores higher?

  • Motorway: Volkswagen ID.3 Neo leads with 38 to 14 points, a margin of 24.
  • City: Volkswagen ID.3 Neo leads with 76 to 68 points, a margin of 8.
  • Family: Volkswagen ID.3 Neo leads with 36 to 25 points, a margin of 11.
  • Charging: Volkswagen ID.3 Neo leads with 49 to 25 points, a margin of 24.
  • Value: Volkswagen ID.3 Neo leads with 82 to 61 points, a margin of 21.

Version facts

Compare the selected versions

Prices are for the specific version. Missing catalogue values stay marked as unavailable.

Facts for Suzuki e VITARA and Volkswagen ID.3 Neo
FactSuzuki e VITARA 49 kWh 2WDVolkswagen ID.3 Neo 50 kWh (2027)
Verified price in PolandPLN 151,900

verified suzuki.pl

PLN 152,990

verified volkswagen.pl

Latest price change
Real-world motorway range · mild weather245 km290 km
Real-world combined range · cold weather225 km260 km
10–80% charging time47 min26 min
Rear boot238 l385 l
Seats5 seats5 seats
Permitted trailer weight750 kgcars.comparison.notAvailable

Available versions

Switch the compared version

Each link keeps the other family's current selection.

Suzuki e VITARA

Volkswagen ID.3 Neo

Winter route model

Charging stops on Polish routes

The range model uses -10 °C and each route's measured average speed.

Energy cost

A Polish charging-cost estimate

Assumptions: 15,000 km/year; 70% at home at PLN 1.20/kWh; 30% at public DC at PLN 2.52/kWh (EIPA snapshot: September 17, 2026).

Estimated energy costs for Suzuki e VITARA and Volkswagen ID.3 Neo
FactSuzuki e VITARA 49 kWh 2WDVolkswagen ID.3 Neo 50 kWh (2027)
Cost per 100 kmPLN 28PLN 25
Cost per yearPLN 4,237PLN 3,806

Annual difference (Suzuki e VITARA − Volkswagen ID.3 Neo): PLN 431.

Optional GA4 analytics helps us understand catalog usage. Advertising features remain disabled. Read our privacy policy