Compare cars
- Citroën ë-SpaceTourer XL 75 kWhRemove
- Citroën ë-SpaceTourer M 50 kWhRemove
- Ford e-Tourneo Custom L2 160 kWRemove
Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Citroën ë-SpaceTourer XL 75 kWhValue: 260 Wh/kmThis car
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Citroën ë-SpaceTourer XL 75 kWh | 260 |
| Citroën ë-SpaceTourer M 50 kWh | 250 |
| Ford e-Tourneo Custom L2 160 kW | 272 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
No comparable purchase-value data is available.
| This car | zł/km |
|---|
Feature matrix
| Feature | Citroën ë-SpaceTourer XL 75 kWh | Citroën ë-SpaceTourer M 50 kWh | Ford e-Tourneo Custom L2 160 kW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | — | — | — |
| Heat pump | — | — | Yes |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | No | No | No |
| Tow hook | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| V2L | No | No | No |
| V2H | No | No | No |
| V2G | No | No | No |
| Battery & range | Citroën ë-SpaceTourer XL 75 kWh | Citroën ë-SpaceTourer M 50 kWh | Ford e-Tourneo Custom L2 160 kW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 69 kWh | 46.3 kWh | 64 kWh |
| Real-world range | 265 km | 185 km | 235 km |
| Efficiency | 260 Wh/km | 250 Wh/km | 272 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 7.4 kW | 7.4 kW | 11 kW |
| DC peak power | 100 kW | 101 kW | 125 kW |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 77 kW | 74 kW | 105 kW |
| 10–80% charge time | 40 min | 28 min | 27 min |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 13.3 s | 12.1 s | 9 s |
| Power | 100 kW | 100 kW | 160 kW |
| Top speed | 130 km/h | 130 km/h | 130 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | RWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 5,308 mm | 4,956 mm | 5,450 mm |
| Width | 1,920 mm | 1,920 mm | 1,999 mm |
| Height | 1,890 mm | 1,890 mm | 1,959 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3,275 mm | 3,275 mm | 3,500 mm |
| Weight | 2,161 kg | 1,969 kg | 2,602 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | — | — | — |