Compare cars
- Toyota Proace Shuttle M 50 kWhRemove
- Renault Zoe ZE50 R135Remove
- Volvo C40 Recharge Pure Electric (2023)Remove
Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Toyota Proace Shuttle M 50 kWhValue: 250 Wh/kmThis car
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Toyota Proace Shuttle M 50 kWh | 250 |
| Renault Zoe ZE50 R135 | 168 |
| Volvo C40 Recharge Pure Electric (2023) | 200 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
No comparable purchase-value data is available.
| This car | zł/km |
|---|
Feature matrix
| Feature | Toyota Proace Shuttle M 50 kWh | Renault Zoe ZE50 R135 | Volvo C40 Recharge Pure Electric (2023) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | — | — | — |
| Heat pump | — | Yes | Yes |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | No | No | Yes |
| Tow hook | Yes | — | Yes |
| V2L | No | No | No |
| V2H | No | No | No |
| V2G | No | No | No |
| Battery & range | Toyota Proace Shuttle M 50 kWh | Renault Zoe ZE50 R135 | Volvo C40 Recharge Pure Electric (2023) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 46.3 kWh | 52 kWh | 67 kWh |
| Real-world range | 185 km | 310 km | 335 km |
| Efficiency | 250 Wh/km | 168 Wh/km | 200 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 7.4 kW | 22 kW | 11 kW |
| DC peak power | 101 kW | 46 kW | 136 kW |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 74 kW | 41 kW | 113 kW |
| 10–80% charge time | 28 min | 56 min | 26 min |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 12.1 s | 9.5 s | 7.4 s |
| Power | 100 kW | 100 kW | 170 kW |
| Top speed | 130 km/h | 140 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | FWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 4,959 mm | 4,087 mm | 4,440 mm |
| Width | 1,920 mm | 1,787 mm | 1,873 mm |
| Height | 1,890 mm | 1,562 mm | 1,596 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3,275 mm | 2,588 mm | 2,702 mm |
| Weight | 1,969 kg | 1,577 kg | 2,045 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | — | — | — |