Compare cars
Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Škoda Enyaq Coupe 60 (2024)Value: 168 Wh/kmThis carLowest value
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Škoda Enyaq Coupe 60 (2024) | 168 |
| Škoda Enyaq 85x (2026) | 169 |
| Peugeot e-Rifter Long 50 kWh | 232 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
No comparable purchase-value data is available.
| This car | zł/km |
|---|
Feature matrix
| Feature | Škoda Enyaq Coupe 60 (2024) | Škoda Enyaq 85x (2026) | Peugeot e-Rifter Long 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | — | — | — |
| Heat pump | Yes | Yes | — |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | No | Yes | No |
| Tow hook | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| V2L | No | No | No |
| V2H | No | No | No |
| V2G | No | No | No |
| Battery & range | Škoda Enyaq Coupe 60 (2024) | Škoda Enyaq 85x (2026) | Peugeot e-Rifter Long 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 58 kWh | 77 kWh | 46.3 kWh |
| Real-world range | 345 km | 455 km | 200 km |
| Efficiency | 168 Wh/km | 169 Wh/km | 232 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 11 kW | 11 kW | 7.4 kW |
| DC peak power | 124 kW | 175 kW | 101 kW |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 82 kW | 120 kW | 74 kW |
| 10–80% charge time | 31 min | 28 min | 28 min |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 8.8 s | 6.7 s | 11.7 s |
| Power | 132 kW | 210 kW | 100 kW |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 180 km/h | 135 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | FWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 4,653 mm | 4,658 mm | 4,753 mm |
| Width | 1,879 mm | 1,879 mm | 1,921 mm |
| Height | 1,617 mm | 1,620 mm | 1,882 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,765 mm | 2,766 mm | 2,975 mm |
| Weight | 2,000 kg | 2,186 kg | 1,841 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | — | — | — |