Compare cars
Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Škoda Enyaq Coupe 60 (2024)Value: 168 Wh/kmThis car
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Škoda Enyaq Coupe 60 (2024) | 168 |
| Škoda Enyaq 85 (2025) | 169 |
| Renault Twingo Electric | 158 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
No comparable purchase-value data is available.
| This car | zł/km |
|---|
Feature matrix
| Feature | Škoda Enyaq Coupe 60 (2024) | Škoda Enyaq 85 (2025) | Renault Twingo Electric |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | — | — | — |
| Heat pump | Yes | Yes | No |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | No | Yes | No |
| Tow hook | Yes | Yes | No |
| V2L | No | No | No |
| V2H | No | No | No |
| V2G | No | No | No |
| Battery & range | Škoda Enyaq Coupe 60 (2024) | Škoda Enyaq 85 (2025) | Renault Twingo Electric |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 58 kWh | 77 kWh | 21.3 kWh |
| Real-world range | 345 km | 455 km | 135 km |
| Efficiency | 168 Wh/km | 169 Wh/km | 158 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 11 kW | 11 kW | 22 kW |
| DC peak power | 124 kW | 135 kW | — |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 82 kW | 120 kW | — |
| 10–80% charge time | 31 min | 28 min | — |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 8.8 s | 6.7 s | 12.6 s |
| Power | 132 kW | 210 kW | 60 kW |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 180 km/h | 135 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | RWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 4,653 mm | 4,658 mm | 3,615 mm |
| Width | 1,879 mm | 1,879 mm | 1,646 mm |
| Height | 1,617 mm | 1,622 mm | 1,541 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,765 mm | 2,766 mm | 2,492 mm |
| Weight | 2,000 kg | 2,141 kg | 1,186 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | — | — | — |