Compare cars
Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Škoda Enyaq Coupe 85x (2025)Value: 167 Wh/kmThis carLowest value
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Škoda Enyaq Coupe 85x (2025) | 167 |
| Peugeot e-Rifter Long 50 kWh | 232 |
| Škoda Elroq 85x (2026) | 173 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
No comparable purchase-value data is available.
| This car | zł/km |
|---|
Feature matrix
| Feature | Škoda Enyaq Coupe 85x (2025) | Peugeot e-Rifter Long 50 kWh | Škoda Elroq 85x (2026) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | — | — | — |
| Heat pump | Yes | — | Yes |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | Yes | No | Yes |
| Tow hook | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| V2L | No | No | No |
| V2H | No | No | No |
| V2G | No | No | No |
| Battery & range | Škoda Enyaq Coupe 85x (2025) | Peugeot e-Rifter Long 50 kWh | Škoda Elroq 85x (2026) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 77 kWh | 46.3 kWh | 77 kWh |
| Real-world range | 460 km | 200 km | 445 km |
| Efficiency | 167 Wh/km | 232 Wh/km | 173 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 11 kW | 7.4 kW | 11 kW |
| DC peak power | 175 kW | 101 kW | 175 kW |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 120 kW | 74 kW | 120 kW |
| 10–80% charge time | 28 min | 28 min | 28 min |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 6.7 s | 11.7 s | 6.6 s |
| Power | 210 kW | 100 kW | 210 kW |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 135 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | AWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 4,658 mm | 4,753 mm | 4,488 mm |
| Width | 1,879 mm | 1,921 mm | 1,884 mm |
| Height | 1,621 mm | 1,882 mm | 1,620 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,766 mm | 2,975 mm | 2,771 mm |
| Weight | 2,234 kg | 1,841 kg | 2,141 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | — | — | — |