Compare cars
Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWhValue: 257 Wh/kmThis car
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh | 257 |
| Polestar 3 Rear Motor (2026) | 198 |
| Škoda Epiq 40 (2027) | 160 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
This car Lowest value
Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWhValue: 1272 zł/kmThis car
| This car | zł/km |
|---|---|
| Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh | 1272 |
| Škoda Epiq 40 (2027) | 500 |
Feature matrix
| Feature | Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh | Polestar 3 Rear Motor (2026) | Škoda Epiq 40 (2027) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | verified MotoNews | — | verified MotoNews |
| Heat pump | — | Yes | Yes |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | No | Yes | Yes |
| Tow hook | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| V2L | No | — | Yes |
| V2H | No | — | No |
| V2G | No | — | No |
| Battery & range | Peugeot e-Traveller L2 50 kWh | Polestar 3 Rear Motor (2026) | Škoda Epiq 40 (2027) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 46.3 kWh | 88 kWh | 37.5 kWh |
| Real-world range | 180 km | 445 km | 235 km |
| Efficiency | 257 Wh/km | 198 Wh/km | 160 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 11 kW | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| DC peak power | 101 kW | 310 kW | 90 kW |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 74 kW | 170 kW | 65 kW |
| 10–80% charge time | 28 min | 23 min | 26 min |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 13.3 s | 6.5 s | 9.8 s |
| Power | 100 kW | 245 kW | 99 kW |
| Top speed | 130 km/h | 210 km/h | 150 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | FWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 4,983 mm | 4,900 mm | 4,171 mm |
| Width | 1,920 mm | 1,968 mm | 1,798 mm |
| Height | 1,890 mm | 1,622 mm | 1,581 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3,275 mm | 2,985 mm | 2,601 mm |
| Weight | 2,027 kg | 2,315 kg | 1,542 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | ~from PLN 228,900 | — | ~from PLN 117,500 |