Compare cars
Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Kia e-Niro 39 kWhValue: 167 Wh/kmThis carLowest value
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Kia e-Niro 39 kWh | 167 |
| Jaguar I-Pace EV320 | 223 |
| Ford e-Tourneo Custom L2 210 kW | 272 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
No comparable purchase-value data is available.
| This car | zł/km |
|---|
Feature matrix
| Feature | Kia e-Niro 39 kWh | Jaguar I-Pace EV320 | Ford e-Tourneo Custom L2 210 kW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | — | — | — |
| Heat pump | — | Yes | Yes |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | No | No | No |
| Tow hook | — | Yes | Yes |
| V2L | No | No | No |
| V2H | No | No | No |
| V2G | No | No | No |
| Battery & range | Kia e-Niro 39 kWh | Jaguar I-Pace EV320 | Ford e-Tourneo Custom L2 210 kW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 39.2 kWh | 84.7 kWh | 64 kWh |
| Real-world range | 235 km | 380 km | 235 km |
| Efficiency | 167 Wh/km | 223 Wh/km | 272 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 7.2 kW | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| DC peak power | 44 kW | 104 kW | 125 kW |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 37 kW | 83 kW | 105 kW |
| 10–80% charge time | 47 min | 45 min | 27 min |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 9.8 s | 6.4 s | 8 s |
| Power | 100 kW | 235 kW | 210 kW |
| Top speed | 155 km/h | 200 km/h | 150 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | RWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 4,375 mm | 4,682 mm | 5,450 mm |
| Width | 1,805 mm | 2,011 mm | 1,999 mm |
| Height | 1,570 mm | 1,565 mm | 1,959 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,700 mm | 2,990 mm | 3,500 mm |
| Weight | 1,667 kg | 2,244 kg | 2,602 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | — | — | — |