Compare cars
Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Škoda Enyaq iV RS (2023)Value: 183 Wh/kmThis car
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Škoda Enyaq iV RS (2023) | 183 |
| Škoda Enyaq 60 (2025) | 164 |
| Peugeot e-Rifter Long 50 kWh | 232 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
No comparable purchase-value data is available.
| This car | zł/km |
|---|
Feature matrix
| Feature | Škoda Enyaq iV RS (2023) | Škoda Enyaq 60 (2025) | Peugeot e-Rifter Long 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | — | — | — |
| Heat pump | Yes | Yes | — |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | No | Yes | No |
| Tow hook | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| V2L | No | No | No |
| V2H | No | No | No |
| V2G | No | No | No |
| Battery & range | Škoda Enyaq iV RS (2023) | Škoda Enyaq 60 (2025) | Peugeot e-Rifter Long 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 77 kWh | 59 kWh | 46.3 kWh |
| Real-world range | 420 km | 360 km | 200 km |
| Efficiency | 183 Wh/km | 164 Wh/km | 232 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 11 kW | 11 kW | 7.4 kW |
| DC peak power | 175 kW | 165 kW | 101 kW |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 103 kW | 110 kW | 74 kW |
| 10–80% charge time | 33 min | 24 min | 28 min |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 6.2 s | 8.1 s | 11.7 s |
| Power | 220 kW | 150 kW | 100 kW |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 160 km/h | 135 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | FWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 4,653 mm | 4,658 mm | 4,753 mm |
| Width | 1,879 mm | 1,879 mm | 1,921 mm |
| Height | 1,604 mm | 1,622 mm | 1,882 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,768 mm | 2,766 mm | 2,975 mm |
| Weight | 2,258 kg | 1,998 kg | 1,841 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | — | — | — |