Compare cars
- Peugeot e-Expert Combi Long 75 kWhRemove
- Škoda Enyaq 85x (2025)Remove
- Peugeot e-Traveller Standard 50 kWhRemove
Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Peugeot e-Expert Combi Long 75 kWhValue: 260 Wh/kmThis car
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Peugeot e-Expert Combi Long 75 kWh | 260 |
| Škoda Enyaq 85x (2025) | 171 |
| Peugeot e-Traveller Standard 50 kWh | 250 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
No comparable purchase-value data is available.
| This car | zł/km |
|---|
Feature matrix
| Feature | Peugeot e-Expert Combi Long 75 kWh | Škoda Enyaq 85x (2025) | Peugeot e-Traveller Standard 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | — | — | — |
| Heat pump | — | Yes | — |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | No | Yes | No |
| Tow hook | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| V2L | No | No | No |
| V2H | No | No | No |
| V2G | No | No | No |
| Battery & range | Peugeot e-Expert Combi Long 75 kWh | Škoda Enyaq 85x (2025) | Peugeot e-Traveller Standard 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 69 kWh | 77 kWh | 46.3 kWh |
| Real-world range | 265 km | 450 km | 185 km |
| Efficiency | 260 Wh/km | 171 Wh/km | 250 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 7.4 kW | 11 kW | 7.4 kW |
| DC peak power | 100 kW | 175 kW | 101 kW |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 77 kW | 120 kW | 74 kW |
| 10–80% charge time | 40 min | 28 min | 28 min |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 14.3 s | 6.7 s | 13.1 s |
| Power | 100 kW | 210 kW | 100 kW |
| Top speed | 130 km/h | 180 km/h | 130 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | FWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 5,308 mm | 4,658 mm | 4,959 mm |
| Width | 1,920 mm | 1,879 mm | 1,920 mm |
| Height | 1,890 mm | 1,620 mm | 1,877 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3,275 mm | 2,766 mm | 3,275 mm |
| Weight | 2,161 kg | 2,230 kg | 1,969 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | — | — | — |