Compare cars
- Fisker Ocean UltraRemove
- Citroën ë-SpaceTourer M 75 kWhRemove
- Ford Explorer Extended Range RWD (2024)Remove
Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Fisker Ocean UltraValue: 213 Wh/kmThis car
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Fisker Ocean Ultra | 213 |
| Citroën ë-SpaceTourer M 75 kWh | 260 |
| Ford Explorer Extended Range RWD (2024) | 176 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
No comparable purchase-value data is available.
| This car | zł/km |
|---|
Feature matrix
| Feature | Fisker Ocean Ultra | Citroën ë-SpaceTourer M 75 kWh | Ford Explorer Extended Range RWD (2024) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | — | — | — |
| Heat pump | Yes | — | Yes |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | Yes | No | Yes |
| Tow hook | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| V2L | No | No | No |
| V2H | No | No | No |
| V2G | No | No | No |
| Battery & range | Fisker Ocean Ultra | Citroën ë-SpaceTourer M 75 kWh | Ford Explorer Extended Range RWD (2024) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 106.5 kWh | 69 kWh | 79 kWh |
| Real-world range | 500 km | 265 km | 450 km |
| Efficiency | 213 Wh/km | 260 Wh/km | 176 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 11 kW | 7.4 kW | 11 kW |
| DC peak power | 250 kW | 100 kW | 185 kW |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 135 kW | 77 kW | 135 kW |
| 10–80% charge time | 35 min | 40 min | 26 min |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 4.2 s | 13.3 s | 8.5 s |
| Power | 400 kW | 100 kW | 150 kW |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 130 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | RWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 4,774 mm | 4,956 mm | 4,468 mm |
| Width | 1,982 mm | 1,920 mm | 1,872 mm |
| Height | 1,631 mm | 1,890 mm | 1,639 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,921 mm | 3,275 mm | 2,767 mm |
| Weight | 2,508 kg | 2,131 kg | 2,080 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | — | — | — |