Compare cars
Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Smart #1 Pro (2024)Value: 188 Wh/kmThis car
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Smart #1 Pro (2024) | 188 |
| Škoda Enyaq 85 (2027) | 167 |
| MG Cyberster Trophy | 175 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
This car Lowest value
Škoda Enyaq 85 (2027)Value: 418 zł/kmThis carLowest value
| This car | zł/km |
|---|---|
| Škoda Enyaq 85 (2027) | 418 |
| MG Cyberster Trophy | 654 |
Feature matrix
| Feature | Smart #1 Pro (2024) | Škoda Enyaq 85 (2027) | MG Cyberster Trophy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | — | verified MotoNews | verified MotoNews |
| Heat pump | — | Yes | — |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | Yes | Yes | No |
| Tow hook | No | Yes | — |
| V2L | Yes | Yes | — |
| V2H | No | No | No |
| V2G | No | No | No |
| Battery & range | Smart #1 Pro (2024) | Škoda Enyaq 85 (2027) | MG Cyberster Trophy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 47 kWh | 77 kWh | 74.4 kWh |
| Real-world range | 250 km | 460 km | 425 km |
| Efficiency | 188 Wh/km | 167 Wh/km | 175 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 7.4 kW | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| DC peak power | 130 kW | 165 kW | 144 kW |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 65 kW | 115 kW | 85 kW |
| 10–80% charge time | 32 min | 30 min | 39 min |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.6 s | 5 s |
| Power | 200 kW | 210 kW | 250 kW |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | 195 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | RWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 4,270 mm | 4,660 mm | 4,535 mm |
| Width | 1,822 mm | 1,879 mm | 1,913 mm |
| Height | 1,636 mm | 1,622 mm | 1,329 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,750 mm | 2,771 mm | 2,690 mm |
| Weight | 1,855 kg | 2,150 kg | 1,960 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | — | ~from PLN 192,250 | ~from PLN 277,900 |