Compare cars
Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS (2026)Value: 168 Wh/kmThis car
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS (2026) | 168 |
| Škoda Enyaq iV 50 (2021-2023) | 170 |
| Škoda CITIGOe iV | 158 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
No comparable purchase-value data is available.
| This car | zł/km |
|---|
Feature matrix
| Feature | Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS (2026) | Škoda Enyaq iV 50 (2021-2023) | Škoda CITIGOe iV |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | — | — | — |
| Heat pump | Yes | Yes | — |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | Yes | No | No |
| Tow hook | Yes | No | — |
| V2L | No | No | No |
| V2H | No | No | No |
| V2G | No | No | No |
| Battery & range | Škoda Enyaq Coupe RS (2026) | Škoda Enyaq iV 50 (2021-2023) | Škoda CITIGOe iV |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 79 kWh | 52 kWh | 32.3 kWh |
| Real-world range | 470 km | 305 km | 205 km |
| Efficiency | 168 Wh/km | 170 Wh/km | 158 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 11 kW | 7.2 kW | 7.2 kW |
| DC peak power | 185 kW | 50 kW | 37 kW |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 135 kW | 45 kW | 29 kW |
| 10–80% charge time | 26 min | 51 min | 49 min |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 5.4 s | 11.3 s | 12.3 s |
| Power | 250 kW | 109 kW | 61 kW |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 160 km/h | 130 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | FWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 4,660 mm | 4,649 mm | 3,597 mm |
| Width | 1,879 mm | 1,879 mm | 1,645 mm |
| Height | 1,608 mm | 1,616 mm | 1,481 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,769 mm | 2,764 mm | 2,417 mm |
| Weight | 2,239 kg | 1,937 kg | 1,235 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | — | — | — |