Compare cars
Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Škoda Enyaq 85x (2025)Value: 171 Wh/kmThis car
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Škoda Enyaq 85x (2025) | 171 |
| Škoda CITIGOe iV | 158 |
| Seres 3 | 196 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
No comparable purchase-value data is available.
| This car | zł/km |
|---|
Feature matrix
| Feature | Škoda Enyaq 85x (2025) | Škoda CITIGOe iV | Seres 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | — | — | — |
| Heat pump | Yes | — | — |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | Yes | No | No |
| Tow hook | Yes | — | No |
| V2L | No | No | No |
| V2H | No | No | No |
| V2G | No | No | No |
| Battery & range | Škoda Enyaq 85x (2025) | Škoda CITIGOe iV | Seres 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 77 kWh | 32.3 kWh | 51 kWh |
| Real-world range | 450 km | 205 km | 260 km |
| Efficiency | 171 Wh/km | 158 Wh/km | 196 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 11 kW | 7.2 kW | 6.6 kW |
| DC peak power | 175 kW | 37 kW | 56 kW |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 120 kW | 29 kW | 50 kW |
| 10–80% charge time | 28 min | 49 min | 45 min |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 6.7 s | 12.3 s | 8.9 s |
| Power | 210 kW | 61 kW | 120 kW |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 130 km/h | 155 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | FWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 4,658 mm | 3,597 mm | 4,385 mm |
| Width | 1,879 mm | 1,645 mm | 1,850 mm |
| Height | 1,620 mm | 1,481 mm | 1,650 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,766 mm | 2,417 mm | 2,655 mm |
| Weight | 2,230 kg | 1,235 kg | 1,765 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | — | — | — |