Compare cars
- Škoda Enyaq 60 (2025)Remove
- Polestar 2 Standard Range Single Motor (2022-2023)Remove
- Renault Zoe Q90Remove
Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Škoda Enyaq 60 (2025)Value: 164 Wh/kmThis carLowest value
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Škoda Enyaq 60 (2025) | 164 |
| Polestar 2 Standard Range Single Motor (2022-2023) | 176 |
| Renault Zoe Q90 | 167 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
No comparable purchase-value data is available.
| This car | zł/km |
|---|
Feature matrix
| Feature | Škoda Enyaq 60 (2025) | Polestar 2 Standard Range Single Motor (2022-2023) | Renault Zoe Q90 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | — | — | — |
| Heat pump | Yes | Yes | — |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | Yes | Yes | No |
| Tow hook | Yes | Yes | — |
| V2L | No | No | No |
| V2H | No | No | No |
| V2G | No | No | No |
| Battery & range | Škoda Enyaq 60 (2025) | Polestar 2 Standard Range Single Motor (2022-2023) | Renault Zoe Q90 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 59 kWh | 66 kWh | 41 kWh |
| Real-world range | 360 km | 375 km | 245 km |
| Efficiency | 164 Wh/km | 176 Wh/km | 167 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 11 kW | 11 kW | 22 kW |
| DC peak power | 165 kW | 136 kW | 43 kW |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 110 kW | 113 kW | 33 kW |
| 10–80% charge time | 24 min | 26 min | 55 min |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 8.1 s | 7.4 s | 13.5 s |
| Power | 150 kW | 170 kW | 65 kW |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 160 km/h | 135 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | FWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 4,658 mm | 4,607 mm | 4,084 mm |
| Width | 1,879 mm | 1,859 mm | 1,730 mm |
| Height | 1,622 mm | 1,479 mm | 1,562 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,766 mm | 2,735 mm | 2,588 mm |
| Weight | 1,998 kg | 2,013 kg | 1,548 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | — | — | — |