Compare cars
- Kia e-Niro 64 kWhRemove
- Hyundai IONIQ 5 Long Range AWD (2022)Remove
- Ford Mustang Mach-E SR AWD (2024)Remove
Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Kia e-Niro 64 kWhValue: 171 Wh/kmThis carLowest value
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Kia e-Niro 64 kWh | 171 |
| Hyundai IONIQ 5 Long Range AWD (2022) | 192 |
| Ford Mustang Mach-E SR AWD (2024) | 207 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
No comparable purchase-value data is available.
| This car | zł/km |
|---|
Feature matrix
| Feature | Kia e-Niro 64 kWh | Hyundai IONIQ 5 Long Range AWD (2022) | Ford Mustang Mach-E SR AWD (2024) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | — | — | — |
| Heat pump | — | Yes | No |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | No | Yes | Yes |
| Tow hook | — | Yes | Yes |
| V2L | No | Yes | No |
| V2H | No | No | No |
| V2G | No | No | No |
| Battery & range | Kia e-Niro 64 kWh | Hyundai IONIQ 5 Long Range AWD (2022) | Ford Mustang Mach-E SR AWD (2024) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 64 kWh | 74 kWh | 72.6 kWh |
| Real-world range | 375 km | 385 km | 350 km |
| Efficiency | 171 Wh/km | 192 Wh/km | 207 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 7.2 kW | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| DC peak power | 77 kW | 233 kW | 150 kW |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 61 kW | 196 kW | 100 kW |
| 10–80% charge time | 46 min | 17 min | 32 min |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 7.8 s | 5.1 s | 6.2 s |
| Power | 150 kW | 239 kW | 242 kW |
| Top speed | 167 km/h | 185 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | AWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 4,375 mm | 4,635 mm | 4,713 mm |
| Width | 1,805 mm | 1,890 mm | 1,881 mm |
| Height | 1,570 mm | 1,605 mm | 1,624 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,700 mm | 3,000 mm | 2,984 mm |
| Weight | 1,812 kg | 2,120 kg | 2,276 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | — | — | — |