Compare cars
- Volvo XC40 Recharge Pure Electric (2023)Remove
- Renault Twingo ElectricRemove
- Škoda Enyaq 85x (2026)Remove
Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Volvo XC40 Recharge Pure Electric (2023)Value: 203 Wh/kmThis car
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Volvo XC40 Recharge Pure Electric (2023) | 203 |
| Renault Twingo Electric | 158 |
| Škoda Enyaq 85x (2026) | 169 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
No comparable purchase-value data is available.
| This car | zł/km |
|---|
Feature matrix
| Feature | Volvo XC40 Recharge Pure Electric (2023) | Renault Twingo Electric | Škoda Enyaq 85x (2026) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | — | — | — |
| Heat pump | Yes | No | Yes |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | Yes | No | Yes |
| Tow hook | Yes | No | Yes |
| V2L | No | No | No |
| V2H | No | No | No |
| V2G | No | No | No |
| Battery & range | Volvo XC40 Recharge Pure Electric (2023) | Renault Twingo Electric | Škoda Enyaq 85x (2026) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 67 kWh | 21.3 kWh | 77 kWh |
| Real-world range | 330 km | 135 km | 455 km |
| Efficiency | 203 Wh/km | 158 Wh/km | 169 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 11 kW | 22 kW | 11 kW |
| DC peak power | 136 kW | — | 175 kW |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 113 kW | — | 120 kW |
| 10–80% charge time | 26 min | — | 28 min |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 7.4 s | 12.6 s | 6.7 s |
| Power | 170 kW | 60 kW | 210 kW |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 135 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | AWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 4,425 mm | 3,615 mm | 4,658 mm |
| Width | 1,873 mm | 1,646 mm | 1,879 mm |
| Height | 1,652 mm | 1,541 mm | 1,620 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,702 mm | 2,492 mm | 2,766 mm |
| Weight | 2,023 kg | 1,186 kg | 2,186 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | — | — | — |