Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh AWD (2026)Value: 187 Wh/kmThis car
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh AWD (2026) | 187 |
| Škoda Enyaq 85x (2027) | 171 |
| TOGG T10X Long Range AWD | 202 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
This car Lowest value
Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh AWD (2026)Value: 561 zł/kmThis car
| This car | zł/km |
|---|---|
| Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh AWD (2026) | 561 |
| Škoda Enyaq 85x (2027) | 427 |
Feature matrix
| Feature | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh AWD (2026) | Škoda Enyaq 85x (2027) | TOGG T10X Long Range AWD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | verified toyota.pl | verified MotoNews | — |
| Heat pump | Yes | Yes | No |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | Yes | Yes | No |
| Tow hook | Yes | Yes | No |
| V2L | No | Yes | No |
| V2H | No | No | No |
| V2G | No | No | No |
| Battery & range | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh AWD (2026) | Škoda Enyaq 85x (2027) | TOGG T10X Long Range AWD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 72 kWh | 77 kWh | 85 kWh |
| Real-world range | 385 km | 450 km | 420 km |
| Efficiency | 187 Wh/km | 171 Wh/km | 202 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 11 kW | 11 kW | 22 kW |
| DC peak power | 150 kW | 165 kW | 180 kW |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 110 kW | 115 kW | 115 kW |
| 10–80% charge time | 29 min | 30 min | 33 min |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 5.2 s | 6.3 s | 4.8 s |
| Power | 252 kW | 220 kW | 320 kW |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | 185 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | AWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 4,520 mm | 4,660 mm | 4,599 mm |
| Width | 1,870 mm | 1,879 mm | 1,886 mm |
| Height | 1,595 mm | 1,620 mm | 1,624 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,750 mm | 2,771 mm | 2,890 mm |
| Weight | 2,080 kg | 2,218 kg | 2,283 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | ~from PLN 215,900 | ~from PLN 192,250 | — |