Compare cars
- Ford Explorer Extended Range RWD (2024-2025)Remove
- Citroën C-ZeroRemove
- Ford e-Tourneo Custom L2 160 kWRemove
Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Ford Explorer Extended Range RWD (2024-2025)Value: 177 Wh/kmThis car
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Ford Explorer Extended Range RWD (2024-2025) | 177 |
| Citroën C-Zero | 171 |
| Ford e-Tourneo Custom L2 160 kW | 272 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
No comparable purchase-value data is available.
| This car | zł/km |
|---|
Feature matrix
| Feature | Ford Explorer Extended Range RWD (2024-2025) | Citroën C-Zero | Ford e-Tourneo Custom L2 160 kW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | — | — | — |
| Heat pump | Yes | — | Yes |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | Yes | No | No |
| Tow hook | Yes | — | Yes |
| V2L | No | No | No |
| V2H | No | No | No |
| V2G | No | No | No |
| Battery & range | Ford Explorer Extended Range RWD (2024-2025) | Citroën C-Zero | Ford e-Tourneo Custom L2 160 kW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 77 kWh | 14.5 kWh | 64 kWh |
| Real-world range | 435 km | 85 km | 235 km |
| Efficiency | 177 Wh/km | 171 Wh/km | 272 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 11 kW | 3.7 kW | 11 kW |
| DC peak power | 135 kW | 40 kW | 125 kW |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 120 kW | 30 kW | 105 kW |
| 10–80% charge time | 28 min | 21 min | 27 min |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 6.4 s | 15.9 s | 9 s |
| Power | 210 kW | 47 kW | 160 kW |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 130 km/h | 130 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | RWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 4,468 mm | 3,480 mm | 5,450 mm |
| Width | 1,872 mm | 1,475 mm | 1,999 mm |
| Height | 1,630 mm | 1,600 mm | 1,959 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,767 mm | 2,550 mm | 3,500 mm |
| Weight | 2,090 kg | 1,140 kg | 2,602 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | — | — | — |