Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
Škoda Enyaq 85 (2027)Value: 167 Wh/kmThis car
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| Škoda Enyaq 85 (2027) | 167 |
| Renault Twingo E-Tech 27.5 kWh | 149 |
| Renault 5 E-Tech 40kWh 95hp | 154 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
This car Lowest value
Škoda Enyaq 85 (2027)Value: 418 zł/kmThis carLowest value
| This car | zł/km |
|---|---|
| Škoda Enyaq 85 (2027) | 418 |
| Renault 5 E-Tech 40kWh 95hp | 502 |
Feature matrix
| Feature | Škoda Enyaq 85 (2027) | Renault Twingo E-Tech 27.5 kWh | Renault 5 E-Tech 40kWh 95hp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | verified MotoNews | — | verified Elektromobilni |
| Heat pump | Yes | No | — |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tow hook | Yes | No | Yes |
| V2L | Yes | Yes | No |
| V2H | No | Yes | No |
| V2G | No | Yes | No |
| Battery & range | Škoda Enyaq 85 (2027) | Renault Twingo E-Tech 27.5 kWh | Renault 5 E-Tech 40kWh 95hp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 77 kWh | 27.5 kWh | 40 kWh |
| Real-world range | 460 km | 185 km | 260 km |
| Efficiency | 167 Wh/km | 149 Wh/km | 154 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 11 kW | 6.6 kW | 11 kW |
| DC peak power | 165 kW | 50 kW | — |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 115 kW | 40 kW | — |
| 10–80% charge time | 30 min | 30 min | — |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 6.6 s | 12.1 s | 12 s |
| Power | 210 kW | 60 kW | 70 kW |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 130 km/h | 135 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | FWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 4,660 mm | 3,789 mm | 3,922 mm |
| Width | 1,879 mm | 1,720 mm | 1,808 mm |
| Height | 1,622 mm | 1,491 mm | 1,498 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,771 mm | 2,493 mm | 2,540 mm |
| Weight | 2,150 kg | 1,275 kg | 1,428 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | ~from PLN 192,250 | — | ~from PLN 130,500 |