Compare cars
- CUPRA Born 170 kW - 77 kWh (2022-2024)Remove
- Ford Mustang Mach-E ER RWD (2023)Remove
- Fisker Ocean SportRemove
Comparison charts
Efficiency vs. similar cars
Energy consumption compared to similar body-type cars
This car Lowest value
CUPRA Born 170 kW - 77 kWh (2022-2024)Value: 171 Wh/kmThis carLowest value
| This car | Wh/km |
|---|---|
| CUPRA Born 170 kW - 77 kWh (2022-2024) | 171 |
| Ford Mustang Mach-E ER RWD (2023) | 190 |
| Fisker Ocean Sport | 203 |
Purchase price / km of range
Purchase price divided by real-world range. This is a purchase-value metric, not the driving cost for 1 km.
No comparable purchase-value data is available.
| This car | zł/km |
|---|
Feature matrix
| Feature | CUPRA Born 170 kW - 77 kWh (2022-2024) | Ford Mustang Mach-E ER RWD (2023) | Fisker Ocean Sport |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price source | — | — | — |
| Heat pump | — | No | No |
| Plug & Charge | No | No | No |
| Battery preconditioning | No | Yes | Yes |
| Tow hook | No | Yes | Yes |
| V2L | No | No | No |
| V2H | No | No | No |
| V2G | No | No | No |
| Battery & range | CUPRA Born 170 kW - 77 kWh (2022-2024) | Ford Mustang Mach-E ER RWD (2023) | Fisker Ocean Sport |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery & range | |||
| Usable battery | 77 kWh | 91 kWh | 71 kWh |
| Real-world range | 450 km | 480 km | 350 km |
| Efficiency | 171 Wh/km | 190 Wh/km | 203 Wh/km |
| Charging | |||
| AC charging power | 11 kW | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| DC peak power | 175 kW | 107 kW | 200 kW |
| 10–80% avg DC power | 103 kW | 84 kW | 100 kW |
| 10–80% charge time | 33 min | 48 min | 31 min |
| Performance | |||
| 0–100 km/h | 7 s | 7 s | 7.4 s |
| Power | 170 kW | 216 kW | 205 kW |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 180 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | FWD |
| Dimensions | |||
| Length | 4,322 mm | 4,713 mm | 4,774 mm |
| Width | 1,809 mm | 1,881 mm | 1,982 mm |
| Height | 1,540 mm | 1,624 mm | 1,631 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,766 mm | 2,984 mm | 2,921 mm |
| Weight | 1,946 kg | 2,160 kg | 2,300 kg |
| Price | |||
| Price from (PLN) | — | — | — |